• Here is the recap for the September 11, 2019 Middlesex Centre Council meeting. If you missed the preview, here it is. Most of the notes below come from my Twitter account, where I live tweeted the meeting.

    Adoption of the Minutes

    Deputy Mayor Brennan asked why the meeting minutes are so scant on details. Clerk Wright responded that Municipal Act prohibits adding specifics about what is said; it’s supposed to have motions and major events only. Minutes for past two meetings approved.

    Delegations, Presentations & Petitions

    Item 6.0

    Deputy Fire Chief Launie Fletcher presented with Governor General Sovereign Medal for Volunteers! Mayor DeViet and Chief Toth presented it to him.

    Item 6.1

    • Brad Bunke from GM BluePlan Engineering now here to speak on Donkers-Hurlbut Municipal Drain Extension. Formal notice of withdrawal by one of the petitioners, which makes the petition deficient under the Drainage Act.
    Photo of Brad Bunke holding map illustrated watershed
    The watershed in question.
    • The major road just to the right of the centre of the map is Highbury Ave. Normal process was followed, lots of daylighting for Union Gas lines. Got all the way to cost estimate and assessment table.
    • GM BluePlan informed in February a petitioner would withdraw, finally occurred in May. This is the standard meeting to review. Deputy Mayor asked why they withdrew – sense that costs were high, may install private tile instead.
    • Deputy Mayor asks why isn’t petitioner on hook for all the costs? Bunke says Drainage Act is clear as to how the assessment is prescribed, regardless of whether the petition was withdrawn.
    • Cllr Aerts seeks clarity on costs assessed. All costs included in the $50K+ assessed to three properties. Now some questions about labour rates for one of the vendors. Bunke explains some of the process that occurred with Union Gas and very large pipes being crossed.
    • Solicitor of Record for Mayoni Enterprises now speaking. Felt costs were too high, other methods weren’t paid any attention. If they had known costs in advance, would have withdrawn sooner. Now surprised that costs assessed are so high, “no economies of scaled were used.”
    • Solicitor asks rhetorical(?) question of whether there’s a way to move project forward at a lesser cost. Reiterates client pulled out because client was bearing majority of cost (as per the Drainage Act).
    • The gentleman that farms the property now speaking. Admits legitimate need to improve drainage. Clay tile installed 40 years ago, not doing its job now. Previous map has incorrect branch endpoint.
    • Adjacent farms already systematically tiled, but rest of drain not designed to take that into account. Says his opinion is this drain is over-engineered. Had another person (not an engineer) take his own stab at design that was less expensive.
    • He called Badger Daylighting and got a quote with a much lower hourly cost ($280 vs. $400), and highlighted that new topographical map wasn’t done but were charged for one.
    • “Is there a separate price for public utilities and private landowners?”
      • Unfortunately, there often is.
    • Mayor DeViet asked staff if there’s a process for appeal. CAO DiLullo indicates we can defer this back to the engineer, and some of the work can be attributed back to Union Gas. Council votes to refer this back to the engineer to see if there’s a way to reduce costs.

    Item 6.3

    • Now onto asset management update. Here are some highlights from the report. Assets mostly in good condition, but a few water and wastewater assets need maintenance or improvement shortly.
    • Asset management update received for info. Onto the Consent Agenda.

    Consent Agenda

    Arnie Marsman clarified some items in the Parks & Recreation Area by-law after our call yesterday to ensure the right intent is described.

    Chief Toth now speaking about the UTV that the Fire Dept would like to buy (all covered by private donations). Only buying one, not one for each fire hall. Fire fighters will be covered under our insurance while operating an off-road vehicle.

    Deputy Major Brennan questioning need for UTV. Trails in Ilderton mostly accessible in either direction, so not a lot of distance for normal fire-rescue vehicle to cover, and number of calls are small. Doesn’t feel all costs accounted for. Disappointed in how this has come about.

    Delaware has another unit that can handle fires out on trails, less expensive and not as modern but it works. Thorndale has something that you can put skis on and such to make it more versatile.

    Some discussion about all the items. I’ll expand in my full report. UTV was pulled out of Consent Agenda. All other Consent Agenda items approved. Recorded vote for UTV reintegration, 4-3 (Silva, Scott, Heffernan & DeViet in favour; Brennan, Aerts, Shipley against).

    Staff Reports

    • Item 8.1 up for debate. Discussing whether to proceed with sale of land, all abutting neighbours would be notified. Motion approved.
    • Item 8.2, crosswalk on Longwoods Rd. I asked which day of week and time of day the traffic count was done, staff doesn’t have that info (normal staff out of office). Cllr Scott says residents and policing committee have been working on this for over a year. County staff amenable.
    • Mayor DeViet makes point that unless intersection is actually safe, people will not walk and therefore you don’t get accurate pedestrian counts. Motion approved. Over to you Middlesex County!

    Correspondence

    Some discussion on the province’s downloading (what else do you call it?) of flood and erosion control funding to the conservation authorities, and that’s a mandatory program. Of course the shortfall will come from property taxes.

    I made the point that City of Kitchener’s point about disposable wipes is true. They’re NOT disposable! Cllr Shipley asked staff to add some info about that to our website; staff will do so when new website launches. Correspondence received.

    By-laws all approved. That means we have appointed Rob Cascaden as the new Director of Public Works & Engineering. Welcome Rob!

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Hi! How are you? I hope you continue to have a fantastic summer. The nights are cold, but the daytime highs are still reaching into the 20s. Hopefully you have a chance to enjoy the warm temperatures still.

    Middlesex Centre Council is now back to its normal 2 meeting per month schedule, and we have our first meeting of September tomorrow. Here is what you can look forward to.

    No closed session! 🙌

    The meeting minutes for July 17, 2019 and August 14, 2019 are now available. Some residents have already noticed a change in how the public meeting comments are recorded. I understand there is far less detail now when it comes to what the public has said at these meetings; detailed notes are still being maintained by the respective staff (e.g. Planner, Development Review Coordinator), but not the Clerk. While I am assured that this revised method does meet the requirements set out in the Municipal Act, I’m not a fan of the change either.

    Delegations, Presentations & Petitions

    The Governor General Sovereign Medal for Volunteers will be presented to Launie Fletcher by Mayor DeViet and Fire Chief Colin Toth. Launie is a long-time firefighter who has served his community very well for decades! Congratulations Launie.

    In what I believe is a first for my time on Council, the Donkers-Hurlbut Municipal Drain Extension is now deficient because one of the property owners has withdrawn their name from the petition. The engineer will present their report and then we will vote on whether to close the file later on in the evening.

    And finally, Peter Simcisko of Watson & Associates will present us with their update on Middlesex Centre’s Asset Management strategy; current state, future state, replacement costs, etc.

    Consent Agenda

    • The proposed Parks and Recreation Area by-law is mostly in great shape. There are a few things that concern me, mostly broad statements like people not being able to “use a sports field for any game or practice” unless authorized by the Director or a permit. I’m waiting for staff to call me back to talk those through.
    • I like being able to have the Clerk approve Municipally Significant Events without Council getting involved, but I’m not certain a $5 million insurance policy is needed. That would added $125 – $300 in costs for hosting the event, though thankfully it is the default amount provided by firms like Duuo.

    I don’t have any comments on the other Consent Agenda items at this time.

    Staff Reports

    After Councillor Scott’s motion last month, which I seconded and voted in favour of, directing staff to look into crosswalk options on Longwoods Rd near Springer Rd/Victoria St, staff are recommending that we ask Middlesex County to install a pedestrian crosswalk. Hopefully we can get this approved and County Council will agree. If so, it sets a good precedent for another high traffic area, that being Komoka Rd for all the children and seniors attempting to cross it.

    Correspondence

    A few items to highlight here:

    • Under a process started by the previous Ontario government, lead by the Ontario Liberal Party, the Progressive Conservative administration is continuing the march toward a Blue Box program that is paid for by producers. This is good news.
    • The City of Kitchener is asking the federal government to get involved in the “flushable wipes” debate. I will remind everyone that there is no definition for “flushable” and the vast majority of items branded in this way, if not all of them, are not, in fact, flushable. Please throw them in the trash.
    • The Conservation Authorities are all concerned about potential changes to mandates, reduction of funds from the province for flood mitigation, and other issues.
    • Our consultant for development charges and asset management, Watson & Associates, has provided lengthy feedback to the Province on proposed changes to development charges and the incoming community benefits charges. There is still a lot of uncertainty to work out by January, and I’m not confident we will get there. I hope the province will agree and push back implementation dates.
    • Wasaga Beach also issued a very strongly worded, one might even consider it rude, letter to the province asking it to back off on further municipal amalgamation without evidence that the desired outcomes (reduced costs, better service) were actually achieved in the late 90s when, for example, Lobo Township, Delaware Township, and London Township were amalgamated into Middlesex Centre.

    Otherwise, to keep you updated on other things I have been up to, I recently reached out to the leadership at Parkview Public School, MPP Monte McNaughton, and Middlesex OPP’s Detachment Commander to set up meetings about a variety of topics. As I have more to share with you on those fronts, I promise to do so.

    Thanks for reading! If you have any questions, comments or concerns to share, please let me know.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • This is the recap of the August 14, 2019 Middlesex Centre Council meeting. If you missed the preview you can read it here, and the preview for the public meeting regarding the official plan and zoning by-law amendment applications for a seniors apartment building near Komoka Rd and Glendon Dr here.

    Council started at 17:00 and went straight into Closed Session. If I recall correctly, we rose out of Closed Session around 18:15.

    Consent Agenda

    Regarding dog licensing, the rationale from staff for this move is that ratepayers are already paying for the pickup of cats and other wildlife through property taxes, meanwhile dogs were singled out for fees. The hope is that with free registration, dog owners will be more apt to register their dogs and therefore the municipality will have a better idea of exactly how many dogs there are. This does not preclude the regulation of cats, especially given how many can be seen roaming our neighbourhoods at any given time, which staff are going to report back on in September or October.

    The motion to reduce dog licensing to $0 was passed. I think you can look forward to staff and Council working to find ways to incentivize registration, regardless of the cost reduction. Like a census, knowing there are X number of dogs can lead to the municipality justifying services for dog owners, like an off-leash dog park.

    All other items in the Consent Agenda were also approved/passed.

    Staff Reports

    • Council approved maintaining in-house snow removal for municipal facilities like arenas and community centres.
    • Regarding the Middlesex Centre Regional Medical Centre’s request to write off the municipal portion of back taxes owing, the following motion was approved:
      • That staff is directed to write a letter to the chair of the medical centre board that the request for a write off of past property taxes was denied;
      • AND THAT council approves removing the green roof at the medical centre at the request of the doctors at a cost to the Municipality of $5,400 plus HST;
      • AND FURTHER THAT council directs staff with the assistance of legal counsel to negotiate a new lease for the medical centre and pharmacy;
      • AND FURTHER THAT Council supports staff to work with legal counsel and proceed with an appeal to the superior court;
      • AND FURTHER THAT Council will review and support a change to the structure of the medical centre board as proposed and recommended by the medical centre board.
    • That last two items are necessary for the medical centre to be structured the same way the Southwest Middlesex clinic in Mt. Brydges is, meaning they would be designated an educational institution and their property tax rate going forward would be substantially modified and reduced.
    • Regarding the Fire Prevention & Training Officer service agreement with North Middlesex, a modified motion was approved, that being:
      • THAT the fire prevention and training officer service agreement is approved;
      • AND THAT the Mayor and Chief Administrative Officer be authorized to sign prior to the fire prevention & training officer is hired.

    Public Meetings

    The first five items were dealt with relatively quickly. No major issues arose and all the recommended motions were approved.

    And then we came to OPA 46 & ZBA-20-19, applied for by 1571145 Ontario Ltd. (Powell) and pertaining to 22447 Komoka Rd. You know, this one. 🙂

    Here are the comments made by the paraphrased comments made by the public:

    • Rob Jonkhans
      • Suspicious of timing regarding application. It’s summer time, lots of people on vacation or otherwise occupied.
      • Lots of questions that need to be answered regarding the need for this development, soil in the ground, and others. (I didn’t catch them all, sorry).
    • Don DeJong
      • Already have similar building ready to go down the road (at Kilworth Heights West); will also serve seniors/retirees
      • Tridon has put lots of time and money in to that existing development
      • This site before us this evening may not actually support two buildings; more testing needed
    • Paul Houghton
      • Concept drawings are not accurate (true, but not really a concern for an OPA or ZBA application)
      • Why does Nov. 2018 report say 112 units vs. latest application says 152 units?
      • How many apartments are there projected in Middlesex Centre’s official plan?
        • My response: A cursory glance does not show projections for what types of units will be built, only how many.
        • The official plan listed 5,788 residential units in 2011, with projections of:
          • 7,015 units in 2021
          • 7,643 units in 2026
          • 8,270 units in 2031
      • He raised some other questions that I didn’t get a chance to write down as well. The full meeting minutes, once available, should have these.
    • Bryan Snyder
      • I (Bryan) had to do hydrogeological testing, geotechnical studies, etc. on my lands. Powell should have to do the same.
      • How much of this pond was filled in when Bella Lago was constructed?
    • Jane Campbell
      • Doesn’t support the application
      • Stormwater management (SWM) concerns
      • Why re-zone now?
    • Jim Graham
      • Why wasn’t this applied to be re-zoned residential during the last Official Plan review?
      • SWM concerns
      • Had to cut unengineered hole in my berm because Powell land couldn’t handle the incoming water, and it could flood upstream homes (as per former Director of Public Works & Engineering)
      • MXC should implement the SWM master plan (SWMMP) first, then can make a decision regarding these applications
    • Rick Dykstra, Dillon Consulting
      • Applicant’s report admits it’s a SWM site (report by LDS Consultants) so it cannot be developed
      • Last SWMMP public information centre (PIC) showed this site as preferred option
      • Same report says water levels vary widely
      • In 2015, Upper Thames Regional Conservation Authority (UTRCA) raised concerns regarding water levels in Komoka
    • Richard Zelinka, Zelinka Priamo
      • This is a significant official plan change
      • OP doesn’t talk about housing on Parks & Recreation land
      • Designated as P&R because it handles stormwater
      • Lands are incapable of handling existing stormwater and snow melt
      • OP secondary plan (for Komoka and Kilworth) calls for multi-unit dwellings near Village Centre (Wellness Centre area)
      • OP review is when you consider big changes (like this one)
    • Margaret Gelinas
      • Not happy that Powell pond takes municipal untreated water, environmental impact
      • Creating another development in area currently zoned as Parks & Recreation is wrong!
      • Need more green spaces in Komoka, not pavement. Vote to not change the zoning and leave it as is.
    • Ms. Longworth (didn’t catch her first name)
      • Middlesex Centre just ranked very well on Maclean’s list of places to live in Canada
      • Consider the aesthetics (again, not something that’s reviewed during an OPA or ZBA application)
    • Gary Bishop
      • Traffic on Komoka Rd is already congested; getting very hard to back out of my driveway at times.

    It didn’t look like anyone else had something to say at this time, so it was Council’s turn. I raised my hand and said the following:

    • The proposed official plan amendment does not meet, in my opinion, the standards set out by items 1.7c, 1.7f, 1.7l, or 5.1.4b of the Official Plan.
    • We are well ahead of our goals of having 3 years of draft approved or registered subdivisions, and 10 years of land designated for residential development as per items 5.2.1c and 5.2.1d of the Official Plan.
    • The OP always comes back to this phrase of considering the “traditional or historic form of existing settlement areas.”
    • Are these apartments for rental or purchase? If they are for purchase, will the applicant ensure that 10% of the units are affordable as per the benchmark set in 5.2.1g?
    • I would argue that 5-storey buildings aren’t compatible with the adjacent densities, as per items 5.2.3b, and the open space may be required for stormwater management, so its premature to say that items 5.2.3a has been satisfied.
    • 3-storey buildings, possibly three of them if needed would add gentle density while still allowing for plenty of open space depending on the results of the SWMMP. It’s premature to make any decisions at this time.
    • The applicant should come to Council with a ZBA that incorporates something to ensure these apartments are, in fact, restricted to seniors. The current ZBA proposed doesn’t do that.

    Just as the public meeting was about to end, a gentleman named Ray Fournier asked to speak. Mayor DeViet allowed him to do so and all he wanted to say was that he wasn’t okay with settling for smaller buildings. The motion to receive the comments for information was passed.

    Notice of Motion

    Councillor Scott’s motion for staff to “bring back an information report along with a recommendation regarding the possible installation of yellow supervised school crossing signage at Longwoods and Springer/Victoria Streets in Delaware at the September 11, 2019 Council meeting for Council’s consideration” was passed.

    In correspondence there is an item from the province regarding possible changes to the Provincial Policy Statement. I’ll be reviewing those in detail.

    And that was it! If you have any questions, comments, or concerns please let me know.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Welcome to another Middlesex Centre Council meeting preview, this time for the only meeting scheduled for August 2019. Here is the full agenda.

    The last public meeting item will be the one I already previewed a few days ago, that being official plan and zoning by-law amendments applied for at 22447 Komoka Rd, Komoka. Please see that post for more details on those applications.

    Council will start at 17:00 and go straight into a closed session to deal with a number of items. We should resume normal Council business by 18:00 and proceed into…

    Consent Agenda

    • The July building report was strong one again. Almost as many pool building permits as home building permits were issued!
    • We are looking at a new lease agreement with Pete’s Sports to offer skate sharpening services at the Wellness Centre!
    • A new, one year lease for Whitehills Childcare Association to continue operating at the Ilderton Arena.
    • Staff need Council approval to complete some emergency repairs to the Wellness Centre’s fire alarm system.
    • Bearing out what many have long thought true, Tiffany Farrell has a report showing that the majority of animal control costs are related to cats and other animals, and is therefore recommending that dog-related costs be moved to the tax levy since animal control benefits the entire community.
      • If approved, it appears dog license registration would be free.
      • Which makes me wonder, should we then pursue licensing cats?
      • How do you feel about this change?
    • The budget to actual report is looking on track overall.
    • Staff are looking to introduce a water payment plan for individuals who have an unexpectedly high bill, likely due to a leak in their home. A smart move that will save residents money if they take a few months to pay it, rather than incurring interest each month. There are limitations of course, and staff are recommending the following:
      • Single family residential properties only
      • The usage must be at least three times the average usage (last quarter is reviewed to determine the average)
      • Plumbing must be in compliance with government regulations
    • Staff are recomending approval to proceed with the Bear Creek Municipal Drain Branch 6, Needham Municipal Drain, and Reig Municipal Drain Branch A improvements

    Staff Reports

    • Community Services completed a cost-benefit analysis of outsourcing snow plowing our community centres and arenas, and came to the conclusion that it’s still better to do the work in-house.
    • Staff are recommending that Council do not approve writing off the Middlesex Centre Regional Medical Centre’s back taxes, but that they proceed with negotiating a new lease, and to appeal to the superior court over the medical centre’s current property tax status (commercial rather than education). I agree with most of that. What I don’t agree with at this time is removing the green roof, considering removing it will further reduce our ability to capture carbon and will likely lead to increased heating and cooling costs for the building.
    • And Tiffany has also prepared a service agreement to use with other municipalities once we hire the Fire Prevention & Training Officer Council approved hiring in July.

    Public Meetings

    Feel free to review the other public meetings coming up on the agenda. As stated previously, the only public meeting of importance to Ward 4 is the official plan amendment and zoning by-law amendment applications put forth by Todd and Cole Powell for 22447 Komoka Road, which is the property behind the Petro-Canada station at Glendon Dr and Komoka Rd.

    I want to add some additional clarity here:

    • This meeting will not see the approval of any official plan amendments, zoning by-law amendments, or development of the site.
    • The applications put forth are only for amending the official plan and zoning by-laws, and those do not explicitly state the built form of the proposed building. Detailed drawings are appreciated, but not expected at this stage.
    • The inaccuracy of the architect’s drawings notwithstanding, many resident concerns can be addressed through zoning or a subdivision agreement, or with the timing of other items Council is waiting on (e.g. the Stormwater Management Master Plan) should this move forward.

    If you have any questions, comments or concerns regarding the items above, please let me know.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Hello, and welcome to a special focus on a public meeting item coming up at the August 14, 2019 Middlesex Centre Council meeting. Next week there will be a public meeting regarding a proposed official plan amendment and zoning by-law amendment for a proposed retirement community consisting of two 5-storey buildings at the southwest corner off Komoka Rd and Glendon Dr, behind the Petro-Canada gas station.

    Aerial View of the Proposal

    The full site is 5.9 hectares in size, is currently zoned A-2 (agricultural), is within the settlement area, and would be serviced by municipal water, and wastewater services.

    On the face of it, I do see some merits to the proposal including:

    • Adding a new housing type to the area, allowing seniors to age in place rather than moving to London or Strathroy.
    • Maintaining the pond and beautifying the property.
    • Based on the language used in the planning justification report, adding a rental option for retirees vs. full ownership or condo style.

    On the other hand, I have questions like:

    • When did 5 stories become the new norm? It feels more like developers are simply using the maximum height available whenever possible rather than using critical design thinking or taking the provincial policy statement to heart where it states:

    Planning authorities shall identify appropriate locations and promote opportunities for intensification and redevelopment where this can be accommodated taking into account existing building stock or areas, including brownfield sites, and the availability of suitable existing or planned infrastructure and public service facilities required to accommodate projected needs.

    Ontario Provincial Policy Statement, 2014
    • The existing building stock in the area reaches a maximum of 2 stories, maybe 2.5 given the height of some of the neighbouring single family dwellings to the west. I would argue that 3 storey buildings makes more sense.
    • How does this play with Tridon’s proposed retirement apartment community at the northwest corner of their Kilworth Heights West development? That site is zoned for a building that could reach as much as 9 stories, but hopefully will be closer to 5 or 6 in an area that is more dense by design.

    So, no decisions have been made, and I doubt any decisions will be made next week. However, given the recent outcry by 10-15 individuals on social media, I’m expecting another firecracker of a public meeting next week.

    If you would like to attend the meeting and make a comment or statement, or ask questions, please do take the time to review the reports provided. You can find them below. Before that, a few more photos of the proposal. More are available in the planning justification report.

    Here are the reports to be reviewed next week. The public meeting portion of the evening will start at 19:00 (7pm).

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶