• Much has been made of the Glendon Drive Environmental Assessment, which lasted over two years, and for good reason! It is a major thoroughfare through our community, handling thousands of vehicles every day. It has old, oddly-oriented connections to it that make safety a problem, even when drivers are following the rules of the road, like Five Corners (Jefferies/Vanneck/Coldstream/Glendon), Kilworth Park Drive, and Old River Road. More connections will be coming soon like an extended Crestview Drive winding through Edgewater Estates and Kilworth Heights West, and a new road to be built to the north which I will illustrate below.

    So, in order to quell any further rumours or speculation, and because I don’t expect anyone not on Council to read through the full 297 page environmental assessment, here are the changes you can expect to see over the next 20 years assuming the following:

    • Middlesex County can budget appropriately for the work in the time frames set out by Stantec
    • Lands that need to be acquired in order to accommodate the changes, where needed, can be acquired in a reasonable amount of time
    • Something else doesn’t throw the plan off course

    Overall, I think you will be pleased. When you pair the recommendations with the vision set out by Dr. Avi Friedman several years ago, it all goes together quite nicely and will help reinforce the village feel we all appreciate about Komoka and Kilworth.

    Section 1 – Glendon Drive from Highway 402 to Komoka Rd

    • This will become a three-lane section of road with a middle turning lane
    • Paved shoulders, which could be used as bike lanes
    • Drainage ditches with flat bottoms will be constructed to improve drainage
    • Concrete box culvert at the Komoka Creek crossing requires extension or replacement
    • No realignment of the creek is proposed
    • The speed limit should remain 80 kph
    • Narrow band of property may be required along the south side for ditch improvements; we will find out for sure during the detailed design process
    • Decorative paving, ornamental trees, and nice signage as you enter Komoka
    • New, large shade trees planted along Glendon Drive along with groups of native shrubs

    From the report, here is what that looks like in practice:

    A snapshot of Section 1 Glendon Drive EA changes
    Click the image for the full version

    And here is a gallery of the changes. Use the arrows on the left and right of the images to browse them.

    Section 2 – West of Komoka Rd to Jefferies / Vanneck

    Big changes ahead for this stretch of road! More lanes, slower traffic, and roundabouts! This works nicely with the village feel we’re aiming for, despite the additional lanes of vehicular traffic.

    • The three-lane section of road expands to four lanes
    • Left-turn lanes where needed
    • A proper curb, which you can see now at Glendon & Queen St, and gutter with storm sewers proposed
    • Boulevard will provide a multi-use pathway on both the north and south sides of Glendon
    • During off-peak hours, the outside vehicular lanes could be converted to on-street parking
      • For example, this occurs on Richmond St in London downtown between Queens Ave and Central Ave
    • Reduce the speed limit to 50 kph through this stretch, enhancing safety for all especially pedestrians and cyclists
    • Stop lights and cross-walks should be installed at Glendon/Tunks Lane, Glendon/Crestview Dr, and Glendon/Springfield Way
    • Coldstream Rd is diverted, with a new road being paved to the west, just south of the rail underpass, then turning south to continue Springfield Way
    • A four-lane roundabout formed by Vanneck, Jefferies, and Glendon Drive
    • Some property will likely be acquired on both sides of Glendon for this stretch to accommodate additional lanes and multi-use paths; we’ll know for certain after detailed design occurs
    • Add landscaped medians
    • Decorative paving, trees, shrubs should be added to the Wellness Centre corner of Glendon/Tunks
    • Lots of other little ornamental touches throughout

    Here is what the typical cross-section of this section of the road should look like:

    Cross-section of Komoka Rd to Vanneck/Jefferies Rd
    Click the image for the full version

    And here is a detailed gallery of how each part of this section of Glendon Drive should look like from above. Use the arrows on the left and right of the images to browse them.

    Section 3 – Jefferies / Vanneck to Kilworth Park Dr

    • Four-lane road, paved shoulders
    • The south side of Glendon would have a boulevard and multi-use pathway
    • Reduce the existing 80 kph speed limit to 70 kph
      • London is anticipated to drop the speed limit on their side of the bridge to 70 kph in the future
    • Improved road side ditch on the north side of Glendon
    • May require a very small amount of property acquisition
    • More streetscape and landscaping touches to continue the aesthetic established to the west

    Here is the typical cross-section:

    Four-lane cross-section from Jefferies/Vanneck to Kilworth Park Dr
    Four-lane cross-section from Jefferies/Vanneck to Kilworth Park Dr

    And here is a more detailed gallery, this time just two images:

    And finally…

    Section 4 – Kilworth Park Drive to Thames River Bridge

    The most significant item in this stretch is the controversial realignment of Old River Road. I don’t endorse this, or the numerous stop lights being introduced, which is why I voted against endorsing the full plan at Council. It passed nonetheless. Additionally you can look forward to:

    • Going back to two-lanes of vehicular traffic
    • The multi-use pathway and boulevard go away east of Kilworth Park Dr, though the wide paved shoulders remain
    • A middle turning lane where needed

    Here is the typical cross-section minus the turning lane:

    And here is a short gallery of the overhead view:

    And there you have it! As far as the timeline goes, Stantec laid out a recommended time frame for each portion of the work. They recommended that Five Corners become a single lane roundabout within the next 5 years, and then a two-lane roundabout within 5-10 years. Komoka & Glendon’s roundabout was recommended to be construction in 5-10 years. Here is a more thorough timetable:

    [table “1” not found /]

    If you have any questions not answered here, please give me a call at 226-448-6774 or email me at silva@middlesexcentre.on.ca.

    If you have a 2018 election campaign-related question, please email me at me@dereksilva.ca. You can also get a hold of me using Facebook or Twitter!

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Since I took office in November 2016, the issue people want to speak with me about the most has been our water and wastewater rates. They want to know why they are so high, and what can be done to reduce them.

    After many discussions about this issue, I can boil down the current situation of high rates to a few causes:

    1. The previous generation of senior leadership (prior Director of Public Works, the old Treasurer, the old CAO) didn’t plan for the future. There wasn’t any money being set aside to repair or replace aging infrastructure, and we are now paying for their sins.
    2. We have multiple systems that are spread out across a geography more than 100 km² larger than the City of London, and much lower population density. This results in inefficiencies that we are slowly correcting, as the budget allows. For example, hooking up Delaware and Komoka together, and no longer relying on London’s connection to Delaware for water. That connection to London has preventing us from allowing any significant growth in Delaware.
    3. We’re ahead of the pack, when it comes to smaller municipalities, in bringing in the Infrastructure Life Cycle Funds. That money is set aside specifically for water and wastewater projects, which is good. The bad side is that it wasn’t phased in, and we didn’t have the resources to do it in a fairer way, like charging based on how much of your property is covered with non-permeable surfaces.

    Most large cities have brought in those life cycle funds already, and lots of other places are also doing so. We are not alone and it will be more common as time goes on.

    When you put all that together, it leads to high minimum charges, and you have the life cycle funds tacked on top of that. You end up with a minimum bill, for most homeowners, of around $100.22 per month. I don’t like it anymore than you do, but things have really stabilized over the last few years and I’m working hard to keep the rates from going up further.

    What Has Been Done

    The Long-Range Financial Plan has us on a good course, but we have been slipping behind the projections in order to maintain a reasonable cost for residents. It’s surely not the end of the world to be behind by $24,000 on a multi-million dollar reserve fund, but it helps illustrate that we are not where experts believe we should be. The reserve funds for water, wastewater, and storm water and designed to hold 10-15% of the funds required to replace the entire system if a catastrophe were to occur. That said, given how healthy the reserves currently are, I feel comfortable continuing to freeze the rates.

    We cancelled our contract with American Water Canada in the fall of 2016, and brought that work in-house with many of the people working for American Water becoming Middlesex Centre employees. This lead to a savings of roughly $550,000 in 2017, which is great for all of us!

    Thanks to that change, and some other minor tweaks and changes to help cut costs, we have been able to freeze the water and wastewater rates two years in a row. Middlesex Centre staff have said there is a chance we can keep them frozen for 2019 as well.

    On January 25, 2017 I put forth a motion for staff to look at the implications of reducing the minimum water and waterwater rates by 2.5%, 5%, and 10% for 2018. This motion was approved by Council. I asked for targeted numbers because I didn’t want to see a report that simply said another freeze would be best. I wanted to see what would actually happen if we reduce the minimums by certain degrees, with 2.5% representing roughly $1 per month of the existing minimum.

    The resulting report clearly illustrated the affect that reducing the minimum fees would have on our reserves. I was disappointed in the narrow interpretation of “ramifications” by BMA’s staff. I was hoping to see something akin to “If minimum monthly charges are reduced by 2.5%, the usage charge would have to increase by X amount to make up for the shortfall.” Alas, that did not occur, but it’s good to see the numbers fleshed out more thoroughly. You have to ask the right questions in order to get the answers you’re looking for.

    What Can be Done?

    Going forward, it’s important to keep on doing a number of things.

    Further growth — including Edgewater Estates, Kilworth Heights West, and Clear Skies in Ilderton — reduces the pressure to increase water and wastewater rates.

    Attracting a commercial or industrial development that uses a lot of water would help tremendously. If the new Foodland across from the Wellness Centre is making and baking bread on-site, and a cafe or restaurant does locate in that plaza, that brings in a larger-than-average water user and helps reduce pressure to increase rates.

    Development charges typically cover between 80 and 90% of the cost to expand services. Where new or expanded services are needed exclusively to support growth, the development charges have covered 100% of the cost. With all the growth coming to Kilworth, Komoka and Ilderton, this brings new people onto the system and helps spread the fixed costs of operating the water/wastewater infrastructure, therefore making it easier to cap or reduce your costs in the near future.

    Right now, that ultimately leaves us between a rock and a hard place and no easy answers. We are funding major construction projects through reserves, allowing for predictable utility and property tax rates instead of large increases or decreases each year. It also leaves us slightly behind the LRFP’s projections.

    One thing we can do, and should be ready in early 2019, is a Union Gas-style Equal Billing Plan (EBP) to provide some predictability. This idea is a slight pivot from another one two residents have previously brought to me, and is doable with our existing billing system. I worked with Deputy Mayor DeViet on this to help massage and mature the idea before bringing it to staff. Thankfully we have been able to craft something that should be a win-win for anyone that opts-in!

    What will happen, if you choose to opt-in, will be exactly what happens with Union Gas: your past history will be calculated, and a fixed monthly cost will be applied to your future water/wastewater bills. If you go over for the whole year, that overage will be covered at the end of the year. If you are under, you will receive a rebate! This has a few wins for everyone:

    • More customers on pre-authorized payments (PAP) reduces administration costs
    • More customers on PAP provides better cash flow
    • More predictability for you allows you to budget more easily and have additional piece of mind that you won’t get socked with a big bill in the summer

    What staff are currently working on is ensuring that people who opt-in to the EBP will still have a way to detect potential leaks!

    I would really appreciate any feedback on the above information, and on the Equal Billing Plan as well! You can get a hold of me here.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Here is your recap of the Middlesex Centre Council meeting that occurred on August 15, 2018.

    For the preview, click here. For the full agenda, click here.

    We started with a Closed Session surrounding the recently completed Employee Engagement Survey, which was brief.

    Brad Bunke of GM BluePlan Engineering provided a detailed report on the Watson municipal drain, with upgrades and maintenance to be completed. There was no dissent from affected property owners at this time, so we approved the drainage works and appointed a Court of Revision to hear any issues in September. I later found out that Councillor McMillan won’t be able to attend that next meeting, so I will be replacing her on the Court of Revision.

    Kim Earls provided a report on the South Central Ontario Region (SCOR) Economic Development Corporation (EDC) and the impact they have been having. I have been skeptical of the need for this organization in the past, even after attending their annual general meeting, but I was happy to see some progress with initiatives like the FoodHub graduating out of SCOR and now being a self-sustaining organization.

    The July Building Report showed a very healthy amount of activity, and we also reviewed 2018 municipal elections accessibility plan. If you have any accessibility needs, I highly recommend you read the report! We also had two successful inspections of the Melrose and Birr water treatment systems.

    Onto a more contentious issue, HLH’s bylaw zoning amendment request, to allow them to erect an additional building at the southwest corner of Ilderton Rd and Hyde Park Rd, was approved.

    I take no pleasure in this. There is a decent amount of opposition to this move, which was expected after the amount of opposition over the Tim Hortons being erected on the site. New business opportunities in our communities are important, but not at the cost of someone’s life. I have serious concerns over that intersection’s ability to handle the current amount of traffic, and the increasing amount of traffic that will come once the Clear Skies development at the northeast corner is completed. We’re going to have to continue to pressure the County to act in a responsible manner as it relates to these roads, as they are County roads. I think several other Councillors also hemmed and hawed over their vote, but at the end of the day there was no justifiable legal basis to deny the application. Voting with your conscience feels good, but decisions also have to be defendable from a planning and legal basis.

    Committee of Adjustment and Public Meetings went smoothly! No significant issues, and no dissenters during public meetings. All applications were approved.

    We had a brief discussion regarding the upcoming AMO conference and who was going. I wasn’t able to attend this year, but am looking forward to attending one or two conferences in 2019!

    And that’s that. The meeting came to an end shortly after that.

    If you enjoy these Council meeting previews and recaps, please support my campaign to stay on as Councillor of Ward 4 for another four years! You can take a lawn sign, donate to the campaign, help me canvass the neighbourhood, or all three!

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Here is your recap of the Middlesex Centre Council meeting that occurred on August 15, 2018.

    For the preview, click here. For the full agenda, click here.

    We started with a Closed Session surrounding the recently completed Employee Engagement Survey, which was brief.

    Brad Bunke of GM BluePlan Engineering provided a detailed report on the Watson municipal drain, with upgrades and maintenance to be completed. There was no dissent from affected property owners at this time, so we approved the drainage works and appointed a Court of Revision to hear any issues in September. I later found out that Councillor McMillan won’t be able to attend that next meeting, so I will be replacing her on the Court of Revision.

    Kim Earls provided a report on the South Central Ontario Region (SCOR) Economic Development Corporation (EDC) and the impact they have been having. I have been skeptical of the need for this organization in the past, even after attending their annual general meeting, but I was happy to see some progress with initiatives like the FoodHub graduating out of SCOR and now being a self-sustaining organization.

    The July Building Report showed a very healthy amount of activity, and we also reviewed 2018 municipal elections accessibility plan. If you have any accessibility needs, I highly recommend you read the report! We also had two successful inspections of the Melrose and Birr water treatment systems.

    Onto a more contentious issue, HLH’s bylaw zoning amendment request, to allow them to erect an additional building at the southwest corner of Ilderton Rd and Hyde Park Rd, was approved.

    I take no pleasure in this. There is a decent amount of opposition to this move, which was expected after the amount of opposition over the Tim Hortons being erected on the site. New business opportunities in our communities are important, but not at the cost of someone’s life. I have serious concerns over that intersection’s ability to handle the current amount of traffic, and the increasing amount of traffic that will come once the Clear Skies development at the northeast corner is completed. We’re going to have to continue to pressure the County to act in a responsible manner as it relates to these roads, as they are County roads. I think several other Councillors also hemmed and hawed over their vote, but at the end of the day there was no justifiable legal basis to deny the application. Voting with your conscience feels good, but decisions also have to be defendable from a planning and legal basis.

    Committee of Adjustment and Public Meetings went smoothly! No significant issues, and no dissenters during public meetings. All applications were approved.

    We had a brief discussion regarding the upcoming AMO conference and who was going. I wasn’t able to attend this year, but am looking forward to attending one or two conferences in 2019!

    And that’s that. The meeting came to an end shortly after that.

    If you enjoy these Council meeting previews and recaps, please support my campaign to stay on as Councillor of Ward 4 for another four years! You can take a lawn sign, donate to the campaign, help me canvass the neighbourhood, or all three!

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Welcome to the preview of this week’s Middlesex Centre Council meeting! Here’s a preview of the issues and motions to be addressed this week:

    • We have a short closed meeting to review the results of the Employee Engagement Survey.
    • Council will start at 6pm, per usual, where the first matter to be addressed is a report from GM BluePlan Engineering on the extension of the Watson Municipal Drain.
    • We’ll also have a presentation from the South Central Ontario Region’s Economic Development Corporation about how 2017 went for them, and the impact they are having.
    • The consent agenda is fairly light, but includes the July Building Report, information on ensuring the upcoming municipal election is accessible, an update on “lame duck” Council restrictions, and the public results of the aforementioned employee engagement survey.
    • A controversial zoning amendment is being applied for at the corner of Ilderton Rd and Hyde Park Rd, seeking to allow an additional building behind the Tim Hortons opened last year.

    Beyond that, the Committee of Adjustment and Public Meeting items all look rather minor. Click here for the full agenda! If you have any questions, comments, or concerns, please email them to silva@middlesexcentre.on.ca.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶