• Hi there! I’m doing something a bit different this week since there are some impactful public meetings affecting Ward 4 next week, so I wanted to dedicate a post just to them today. I’ve gone back and forth with staff on a few of these already, so hopefully I have the answers you seek even before you ask them! 🙂

    10114 Union Avenue, Komoka

    This application would consider creating 9 building lots for single detached dwellings on 0.6 hectares (1.48 acres) of land, that would be serviced by municipal water and sanitary sewers and fronting onto Union Avenue.

    The light-coloured box is where the 9 homes would go, if approved.

    If this proceeds, it would complete the development along Union Ave. The portion marked A2 above (10152 Oxbow Drive) is privately owned property with agricultural zoning, and 10125 Oxbow Drive (bordered in pink) is a cemetery. I highly doubt either property will de altered any time soon.

    Southwinds/EdgeWater Estates

    Southwinds has requested that the remaining phases of the development be subject to an amended plan of subdivision and also that the zoning of the property be changed to reflect the requested amended plan of subdivision.

    Specifically, Southwinds is proposing to develop the residential development blocks for single detached dwellings as well as make changes to the road network and various blocks. If approved, the Plan of Subdivision would include approximately 200 residential lots in the form of single detached dwellings within Phase 2.

    The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment proposes to establish the ‘Urban Residential First Density’ (UR1) with Holding Symbol (H1) on a 0.859 hectares corridor of land fronting Edgewater Boulevard previously identified as Block 158. These lands would accommodate eight residential lots, surrounding the southern portion of the stormwater management pond.

    The Zoning By-law Amendment further proposes to amend the boundaries of the current ‘Urban Residential First Density’ (UR1) and Open Space (OS) and ‘Urban Residential Second Density’ (UR2) with Holding Symbol (H1) zones that were part of the previously approved redline revision.

    Lastly, adjust the zoning of the boundary for the entrance to Block 244 (previously Block 144, on the southwestern portion of the lands). This is to reflect the removal of the public road and replace it with a private entrance to the multiple residential block. As such, the zoning is to be changed to ‘Urban Residential First Density’ (UR1) with Holding Symbol (H1) to align with the balance of the Block. This private drive would be for the approximately 33 units in the southwest corner of the lands.

    The changes proposed for the lands in question. The orangey lands would change from open space to adding 8 new homes. The portion to the bottom right where the blue road leads is already slated for ~33 homes.

    You can review the full document here.

    In speaking with staff, I had to clarify a number of misconceptions that several residents and I all had after the previous rounds of public meetings, namely:

    • Crestview Dr will be connected to Edgewater Estates through the Kilworth Heights West subdivision (Phase 1). From my conversations with the head of Tridon, Crestview Ave should connect from north to south across their lands by Spring 2019. If EdgeWater follows suit, 2019 should see full connection and reduce anyone’s reliance on Westbrook Dr or Crestview Ave to access EdgeWater Estates.
      • We will see an ultimate increase in traffic, of course, simply due to the large addition of lots. That’s unavoidable. However it should be less than previously thought if Crestview Ave was not connected until 2020 or later.
    • What many of us thought was going to be a public trail from north to south, all along Kilworth Heights West and EdgeWater Estates, was never slated to be that long. Here is the language from the agreement:
      • That prior to final approval of Phase 2, the Owner shall construct a Public Recreational Trail commencing from Glendon Drive and extending southerly for a distance of approximately 695 metres and shall also design and construct a dual bike lane and a single sidewalk within the road allowance of Edgewater Boulevard extending to Block 149 to the satisfaction of the Municipality.
      • That 695m ends at the border between Kilworth Heights West and EdgeWater Estates. Here is the route that trail is proposed to take:
    The coloured path is the planned route for the trail.

    You can review the detailed drawings here, with the coloured marking provided to me by municipal staff.

    Jan 22, 2019 Update: Planning staff’s report is now available, with comments from other agencies like Union Gas, Bell, and the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry on pages 9 and 10.

    I think this alleviates some of the concerns, but will likely bring others to the fore. I imagine some of you may feel duped as well, but I guess that’s how we learn that the language in the legal documents is really what counts!

    If you have any feedback on the above applications, please let me know.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • If you missed the agenda and preview, you can find it here.

    Delegations, Presentations, and Petitions

    • We had a lengthy presentation from John Mascarin, along with his colleague Megan (didn’t catch her last name), on the roles and responsibilities he has as our Integrity Commissioner and Closed Meeting Investigator. He went over a lot of case law pertaining to the laws in place, and also briefed us on the changes coming on March 1, 2019.
      • One item that should help anyone stay out of trouble is that, as of March 1, Councillors will be able to request advice on a matter. The advice must be in writing, and the responses must also be in writing.
    • Beginning at 7pm, Andrew Grunda and Peter Simcisko of Watson & Associates also completed their presentation on development charges; history, context, and current state were all there, along with a brief discussion of the full review that will happen later this year. A good primer for the new Councillors.
    • Tony Commisso of Cowan Insurance also came to do a primer and refresher on all the insurance policies Middlesex Centre has in place, 13 of them he highlighted during the meeting.

    Consent Agenda & Staff Reports

    • Given how much detail I provided in the preview, I will keep this brief.
    • Middlesex Centre Council has opted to allow for private retail sales of cannabis in our Municipality. Given the small number of licenses currently up for grabs, and the province’s focus on placing the first ones in communities with a population over 50,000, we’re not anticipating any licenses being applied for in Middlesex Centre, or being issued, in the next few years.
      • This does, however, set us up for a higher amount of funding than we would have received otherwise, which will help offset any increases in policing costs or educational programs.
    • Council voted to give Watson & Associates the contract for our 2019 development charges study. I made a point to say that while I don’t like sole source contracts, this one makes sense because of the history Watson & Associates already has with the Municipality, and that brining in a new vendor now would actually result in higher costs as they would likely need to duplicate a lot of previous work.
    • Council voted to defer initiating the process for hiring a new CAO, with comments citing the need to possibly look for someone with different expertise, experience, and education — for example, someone with a Masters of Business Administration degree, rather than focusing only on individuals with a Masters of Public Administration. Council members were to submit feedback to our Acting CAO and Mayor as quickly as possible, and before the next Council meeting.
    • Finally, removing the holding provision over EdgeWater Estates’ phase 1 was approved.

    If you have any questions, comments, or concerns please let me know. Thanks for reading!

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • I was fortunate enough to be invited to the Middlesex-London EMS headquarters grand opening! I was able to cut down a multi-hour affair down to 7 minutes, so hopefully you watch the whole thing. 🙂 If you have any questions about it, please let me know.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Let’s make one thing clear: I would love an indoor pool in Middlesex Centre! Whether it was located in Komoka, Ilderton, Delaware, or even Bryanston, an indoor pool in the Municipality would be a fantastic addition. I get that the Wellness Centre doesn’t contain any services that some individuals want to utilise. I would say, though, that the YMCA does have subsidies available, so you should ask them for more information if you’re interested in some of the services they provide but cannot afford the full rate.

    Additionally, my spouse and I are fortunate enough to be able to pay for private lessons at a private, in-ground pool each summer, but certainly I recognize not every family can afford the time or money to do this for their children.

    Speaking of the costs related to an indoor pool specifically, I have been gathering information ever since Dave Pinheiro’s request on the Kilworth Neighbours Facebook group for a facility similar to Strathroy’s. I also heard about this several times during last fall’s election campaign. Here are the concerns I have:

    • An inground, indoor pool would cost between $9M and $13M to build, as per South Huron’s recent study
    • The Strathroy Aquatic Park cost $2.9M to build; this does not include engineering, architecture, or project management costs
    • The Strathroy Aquatic Park costs over $300,000 per season to operate (page 4), roughly 2/3 of which comes from property tax
    • The St. Mary’s Aquatic Centre (an indoor pool) costs roughly $1M per year to operate
    • The St. Mary’s Aquatic Centre’s revenue is around $400,000 per year; so it loses about $600,000 overall (as per their Director, whom Scott Mairs spoke with recently on my behalf)
    • Besides all that, you would still need to pay to use the facility
    • Assuming a $10M construction/design/engineering (CDE) cost, amortized over 25 years, and also assuming all properties paid the same amount towards the CDE cost, that would add an additional $55.09 per year in property taxes
    • Assuming a $1M operating cost without any revenue – because I can’t guess how often it’ll be used or if we could sign up any memberships like St. Mary’s has – and an equal load across all properties, we could all look at paying an additional $137.74 per year in property taxes
    • For argument’s sake, since we don’t know the final construction cost, assume you would be paying $300 over 25 years while the construction fees are paid off.

    So, is that worth it to you? I suspect some will say yes, versus the prospect of building your own pool at an upfront cost of at least $5,000 for a high quality, above ground pool. I would probably say the same, personally. That said:

    • There was a feasibility study completed in conjunction with options for renovating or building a new arena in Ilderton last year. The general guideline used is that an indoor pool is only feasible when a population reaches 40,000. We won’t be hitting 40,000 anytime soon, so the feasibility study discounted that as a possibility.
    • An indoor pool was also assessed during the Wellness Centre’s planning.
    • You will still have to pay to use the facility, and
    • There is no guarantee it would be built in Komoka/Kilworth. It could be built in Delaware, Denfield, Poplar Hill, Ilderton, Arva, Birr, Bryanston, or even Melrose.
      • Okay, it’s unlikely it would be built somewhere other than Delaware, Komoka/Kilworth or Ilderton, but I think you get the point! 🙂

    Anyway, all that to say that if a sufficient number of residents understand the full implications of building a pool, especially the capital, operating, and ongoing equipment replacement costs over a period of time, I could personally get behind this. But that will involve polling a fairly large sample of the municipality and being able to provide those individuals with real costs, or at least very close to real costs. You can see above I’m making a few guesses for illustrative purposes.

    So, while we debate the willingness for residents to pay for such a structure, and the impact it would have on our municipal debt, London has four options to choose from all year round, as well as several more during the summer, and the facility in St. Mary’s!

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Welcome to this preview for the first open meeting of 2019! Council previously had a special, closed meeting on January 3 but, of course, there is nothing I can discuss openly about that at this time.

    In the meantime, you can find the agenda for this meeting here.

    Delegations, Presentations, and Petitions

    • Council will be starting early, at 4pm, to allow for a lengthy presentation, and no doubt a bunch of questions, from Middlesex Centre’s Integrity Commissioner & Closed Meeting Investigator. John Mascarin, Partner with Aird & Berlis LLP will perform the presentation.
    • We will then have a presentation on development charges by Andrew Grunda and Peter Simcisko of Watson & Associates. W&A has been contracted for the past few years to help our staff compile projects, costs, and so on to ensure we’re charging the appropriate fees for development charges.
    • Finally, we will have a presentation from Tony Commisso, our representative and Regional Manager at Cowan Insurance, the municipality’s insurance provider.

    Consent Agenda

    There is just one item on the consent agenda, which states that we have yet to hear from the provincial government what Middlesex Centre’s Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund amount for 2019 will be. It is already over one month later than normal, so hopefully we get the number soon! Staff are anticipating a 10% decline in the amount to be provided for 2019.

    Staff Reports

    • First up is cannabis legalization.
      • We now have some more certainty around the funding ramification for staying opted-in to allow private cannabis sales in Middlesex Centre vs. opting out.
      • Based on the attached report, Middlesex Centre stands to receive at least $5,000 in assistance from the province to be spent, ideally, on costs related to legalization. The other half of the guaranteed $5,000 will go to the County. The County stands to receive at least $16,000 because it is the upper-tier level for 8 municipalities.
      • This money could go towards increased OPP costs or locally-driven education programs, possibly developed and administered by the Middlesex-London Health Unit.
      • Of course we have to understand that a limited number of private retail licenses are being issued each year, and it is very unlikely a business in Middlesex Centre will receive one prior to 2021.
      • Also, opting out simply means residents wanting to partake will have to purchase their cannabis elsewhere. It doesn’t mean you won’t be able to use cannabis products within Middlesex Centre.
    • The second staff report is a recommendation to hand Watson & Associates a contract to complete the 2019 Development Charges study. Development charges must be reviewed every 5 years, and 2019 is that fifth year. There are several new projects that need to be included in a revised DC figure, so it’s important that the work be done well.
    • There is a staff report that seeks to establish the criteria for hiring a new Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) after the recent departure of Michelle Smibert, who was Middlesex Centre’s CAO for over 8 years.
    • Lastly, a staff report that recommends removing the holding provision over EdgeWater Estates, the new development to the west of the southern portion of Kilworth.
      • Removing the holding provision would allow South Winds to begin constructing the single detached dwellings zoned for the land.

    There are no overtly significant correspondence items, so that’s that! If you have any questions, comments, or concerns over the items above, please contact me!

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶